Bertrand Russell The Value Of Philosophy Essay Outline

Introduction to Philosophy

Bertrand Russell, "The Value of Philosophy"

Abstract: Russell distinguishes between the practical and the philosophic mind, compares the relation of science and philosophy, and traces the major goals of philosophy in chapter fifteen of his Problems of Philosophy.

  1. How would you describe Russell's practical person?
  2. Why not live one's life as a practical person?
  3. What are the goals of philosophy?
  4. What does Russell think is the central value of philosophical inquiry?
  5. Characterize the instinctive individual.
  6. What is "enlargement of self"?
  7. How does philosophical thinking relate to living and acting in the world? Suggest some examples.
  1. Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) was a philosopher, mathematician, and social reformer.
    1. A few biographical points are worth mentioning:
      1. Russell's parents died when he was a child; John Stuart Mill was his godfather.
      2. He taught at Trinity College, Cambridge but was dismissed because of his pacifist activities during World War I.
      3. He supported himself through lecturing and writing from 1919 until the late 1930's.
      4. He accepted a position of the City College of New York, but before he could accept his duties, a judge denied his position saying Russell was a threat to "public health, safety and morals."
      5. The Nobel Prize Committee described him as "one of our time's most brilliant spokesmen of rationality and humanity, and a fearless champion of free speech and free thought in the West."
      6. Russell co-authored with Alfred North Whitehead, Principia Mathematica. He had hoped to reduce mathematics to logic.
    2. Notes are arranged in response to the questions stated above in reference to Russell's chapter "The Value of Philosophy" edited from The Problems of Philosophy available on this site: "Enlargement of Self." For the unedited version, see the Further Reading section below.
      1. How would you describe Russell's practical person?
        1. The practical mind is a Philistine: a person deficient in liberal culture, according to Russell: someone whose interests are material and commonplace.
        2. The instinctive man is practical as is the man of self-assertion described later. He is not interested in providing for society and not interested in "goods for the mind."
        3. His friendships are "friendships of utility," not as Aristotle describes "friendships of the good." The practical person is interested in people for what they can do for him.
        4. The practical person is more interested in "the answer" rather than how one obtains an answer.
        5. He has a "them against us" mentality. E.g., Vince Lombardi, the well-known American football coach, is famously known for saying, "Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing" and as well, he stated, "Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser." Contrast Lombardi's attitude with, for example, with Leo Buscaglia's prescription to "celebrate life" and "develop a passion for many things."
      2. Why not live one's life as a practical person?
        1. The practical person recognizes material needs; he is less aware of goods of the mind. For example, philosophy can give a different kind of value to life—not something superadded to material value, but a value intrinsically different. Consider what Socrates said about "tending your soul." as a means to a life of excellence.
        2. The philosophical mind has an awareness that goes beyond the daily round to an understanding of life and the world.
        3. Generally the practical person does not recognize basic truths about everyday life such as…
          • In general, choices cannot justified by their consequences.
          • Perception is not reality. How things appear to be is less important than how they are.
          • The excuse that "things turned out all right" is not always sufficient. Often, the practical person is unaware of true consequences.
          • You can be right for the world, even though the world is not right for you.
          • The practical person often does not notice the world and the people in it because of his own worries that tend to feed upon themselves.
      3. What are the goals of philosophy?
        1. First, Russell looks at the relation between science and philosophy in the past as a question which must be answered first.
        2. Consider the following sketch of the origins of the sciences from persons who were considered at the time to be philosophers but are now considered to be some of the founders of the various sciences.
          DateFigureDisciplineWork
          582?-500? BCPythagorasMathematicsPythogorean theorem; geometry
          408-355 BCEudoxusMathematicsirrationals, number theory
          about 300 BCEuclidMathematicsElements (300 BC)
          490?-430 BCEmpedoclesBiologyOn Nature: theory of evolution
          384-322 BCAristotleBiologyDe Anima (350 BC)
          460?-377? BCHippocratesBiologyAirs, Waters, and Places (400 BC)
          1571-1630KeplerAstronomyAstronomia nova (1609)
          1473-1543 CopernicusAstronomyDe Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium (1543)
          1546-1601BraheAstronomyEpitome of Copernican Astronomy (1618-1621)
          1564-1642GalileoPhysicsThe Starry Messenger (1610)
          1642-1727NewtonPhysicsPhilosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687)
          1743-1794LavoisierChemistryTraité Élémentaire de Chimie (1789)
          766-1844DaltonChemistryNew System of Chemical Philosophy (1808)
          1798-1857ComteSociologyCourse of Positive Philosophy (1830-1842)
          1806-1873MillSociologyLogic of the Moral Sciences (1843)
          1858-1917DurkheimSociologySuicide: A Study in Sociology (1897)
          WundtPsychologySystem der Philosophie (1889)
          1842-1910JamesPsychologyPrinciples of Psychology (1890)
          1849-1936PavlovPsychologyConditioned Reflexes (1926)
        3. Hence, as soon as definite knowledge concerning any subject becomes possible, this subject draws its own skilled practitioners. The subject leaves philosophy and becomes a science.
          1. Questions with definite answers come from fruitful presuppositions and are placed in the sciences. Philosophy, like science, aims at knowledge, but that knowledge can only come to fruition in another age in a science born from philosophical inquiry.
          2. Consider the example that the distinction between moral philosophy and natural philosophy was the main division of the curriculum in many universities as late as the beginning of the twentieth century.
          3. Consider also the terminal degrees given in many different fields of knowledge such as literature, science, music, and so-forth are PhD's—i.e., Doctor of Philosophy.
        4. What does Russell think is the central value of philosophical inquiry?
          1. Russell gives the examples of philosophical questions in the following passage:
            • "Has the universe any unity of plan or purpose, or is it a fortuitous concourse of atoms? Is consciousness a permanent part of the universe, giving hope of indefinite growth in wisdom, or is it a transitory accident on a small planet on which life must ultimately become impossible? Are good and evil of importance to the universe or only to man? Such questions are asked by philosophy, and variously answered by various philosophers."
          2. Notice that these questions exemplify the main divisions of philosophy studied previously in these notes:
            1. Russell's questions "Has the universe any unity of plan or purpose? Is consciousness a permanent part of the universe?" is a metaphysical or ontological question.
            2. Russell's question "Is there hope of indefinite growth in wisdom?" belongs to epistemology.
            3. And, finally, the question "Are good and evil subjective?" represents the divisions of axiology which includes the subdivisions of ethics and æsthetics.
          3. To attempt to Russell's questions we would investigate these main fields of philosophical inquiry:
            1. Ontology (Metaphysics): the study of what is really real.
            2. Epistemology: the study of knowledge—its scope and limits.
            3. Axiology: the study of values.
              • Ethics: the study of the good and what constitutes a good life.
              • Æesthetics: the study of the beautiful.
          4. As far as the main value of philosophy, Russell says philosophy seeks knowledge like science, but is different from science.
            1. Recognizing that there is no absolute certainty, philosophy shows unsuspected possibilities about matters of fact. Consider, for example, Norwood Russell Hanson's question: "Do Kepler and Tycho see the same thing in the east at dawn?"
            2. Hence, philosophy increases the possibility of knowledge through the reduction of dogmatism.
          5. Russell says the chief value is the "greatness of objects which it contemplates." Thus it is reasonable to infer the object of epistemology is truth, that of ontology is reality, that of ethics is the good, that of æsthetics is beauty.
          6. Thus, philosophy gives freedom from narrow and practical aims: an escape from the daily round.
      4. Characterize the instinctive individual.
        1. The instinctive person lives in a prison of his own making—much like an animal aware only of what it senses and feels.
        2. The instinctive person tends not to look beyond what is before him at the moment.
        3. Being unaware of the larger world can put our private world in ruins when we do not think about the meaning of change and cause.
      5. What is "enlargement of self"?
        1. "Enlargement of self" is Russell's expression for the person of liberal culture, wide interests, reflection, understanding, and self-motivation.
        2. Russell's phrase "a share in infinity" denotes the approach of synoptic philosophy.
          1. Consider the following example: What, specific essential information could an expert in each the following fields of knowledge advise about the purchase of floor covering in the newly proposed science building? The person of wide interests would be able to state three or four crucial factors for each of the following fields: anthropology, art, astronomy, botany, chemistry, communications, computer science, ecology, economics, geography, geology, history, linguistics, literature, mathematics, music, physical education, physics, political science, psychology, religion, sociology, theatre arts.
          2. Enlargement of self takes an objective view to escape from the instinctive circle of the daily round. When you see yourself as a process, you see yourself developing as you will be. (E.g., why are beginners afraid to make mistakes? After all, if one did not make mistakes, one would not be a beginner.)
          3. Do not define yourself in reaction to what others say you must do: self-reliance
          4. Pursue an interest for its own sake—not what it can do for you. Recognize that there are many possibilities for solutions—not just the pragmatic or dogmatic "right or wrong" dichotomy.
          5. Being motivated to seek knowledge leads to a richer view of the world.
        3. By way of contrast, the way of self-assertion views the world as a means to its own end and sees the world in terms of itself: pragmatic, dogmatic, instinctive, and direct.
          1. On this view, getting results or getting the right answer is more important that understanding how such things are accomplished.
          2. The practical mind leads to a limited and impoverished view of the world—there is a lack of creativity and a lack of play with things.
          3. If one is self-assertive, then sometimes minor slights are taken personally. There might be other reasons for an individual's behavior that do not involve you.
          4. Enlargement of self does not shape such dualisms as the "them against us" mentality.
      6. How does philosophical thinking relate to living and acting in the world? Suggest some examples.
        1. The key to this question is "impartial contemplation." Taking sides in interpersonal almost always involves a dogmatic position.
        2. Our external physical states such as money, job, car, make little difference if one is reaching one's life goals. The main concern may be happiness vs. misery rather than a question of being an auto mechanic or a corporation executive.
        3. The philosophic mind is open and nonjudgmental. Such a person does not expect other people or situations to change just to fit what that person wants in order for that person to be happy.
        4. The philosophic mind has the recognition that it could be wrong in any situation.
  2. The Wikipedia entry on Bertrand Russell is recommended for an overview of Russell's life and works.

Further Reading:

“The nature of mind precludes any discovery or deduction, whether physical or moral, until experiments have been made, or proofs investigated; and the progress of science during the last most conclusively teaches us, that the last attainment of a philosophic mind, as the result of all its inductive enquiries, is the poser of forming a simple proposition. To this end, how did Newton toil, that he might trace the demonstrations which enabled him to assert the laws of the planetary system!” Rev. Richard W. Dickinson, “On the Origin of Our Idea Respecting God,” in Literary and Theological Review (New York: Franklin Knight) (December, 1835) Vol. II, No. VIII, 568.

Relay corrections, suggestions or questions to
larchie at lander.edu
Please see the disclaimer concerning this page.
This page last updated 08/29/12
© 2006 Licensed under the GFDL

  

Home

About the Book

Instructor Resources

Student Resources

Quizzes on Reading

Betrand Russell, "The Value of Philosophy"

Plato, "Apology: Defence of Socrates"

Saint Anselm, "The Ontological Argument"

Saint Thomas Aquinas, "The Existence of God"

William Paley, "Natural Theology"

Blaise Pascal, "The Wager"

Bertrand Russell, "Why I Am Not a Christian"

David Hume, "Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion"

Gottfried Leibniz, "God, Evil and the Best of All Possible Worlds"

John Perry, "Dialogue on Good, Evil, and the Existence of God"

Edmund L. Gettier, "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?"

René Descartes, "Meditations on First Philosophy"

Christopher Grau, "Bad Dreams, Evil Demons, and the Experience Machine: Philosophy and The Matrix"

Robert Nozick, Excerpt from Philosophical Explanations

David Hume, "Of Scepticism with Regard to the Senses"

David Hume, "An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding"

W. C. Salmon, "The Problem of Induction"

Bertrand Russell, "The Argument from Analogy for Other Minds"

Gilbert Ryle, "Descartes's Myth"

David M. Armstrong, "The Nature of Mind"

Daniel Dennett, "Intentional Systems"

Paul M. Churchland, "Eliminative Materialism"

Frank Jackson, "What Mary Didn't Know"

A. M. Turing, "Computing Machinery and Intelligence"

John Searle, "Minds, Brains, and Programs"

John Perry, "A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality"

Bernard Williams, "The Self and the Future"

Derek Parfit, "Personal Identity"

J. David Velleman, "So it Goes"

Daniel Dennett, "Where Am I?"

Roderick M. Chisholm, "Human Freedom and the Self"

Peter van Inwagen, "The Powers of Rational Beings: Freedom of the Will"

David Hume, "Of Liberty and Necessity"

Harry G. Frankfurt, "Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility"

John Martin Fischer, "Responsiveness and Moral Responsibility"

Harry G. Frankfurt, "Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person"

Thomas Nagel, "Moral Luck"

Jeremy Bentham, "The Principle of Utility"

John Stuart Mill, "Utilitarianism"

E. F. Carritt, "Criticisms of Utilitarianism"

J. J. C. Smart, "Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism"

Bernard Williams, "Utilitarianism and Integrity"

Peter Singer, "Famine, Affluence, and Morality"

Immanuel Kant, "Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals"

J. David Velleman, "A Brief Introduction to Kantian Ethics"

Onora O'Neill, "Kantian Approaches to Some Famine Problems"

Thomas Nagel, "War and Massacre"

Rosalind Hursthouse, "Right Action"

John Rawls, "A Theory of Justice"

Robert Nozick, "Justice and Entitlement"

G. A. Cohen, "Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice"

John Stuart Mill, "The Subjection of Women"

Debra Satz, "Markets in Women's Reproductive Labor"

Kwame Anthony Appiah, "Racisms"

Thomas Nagel, "The Absurd"

Albert Camus, "The Myth of Sisyphus"

Richard Taylor, "The Meaning of Human Existence"

Susan Wolf, "The Meanings of Lives"

Thomas Nagel, "Sexual Perversion"

Alan Goldman, "Plain Sex"

Anthony Brueckner and John Martin Fischer, "Why is Death Bad?"

Flashcards

Link to Blog

Downloadable Logical Toolkit

Downloadable Writing a Philosophy Paper

Glossary of Philosophical Terms

 

Contact Your Sales Rep

Higher Education Comment Card

0 Replies to “Bertrand Russell The Value Of Philosophy Essay Outline”

Lascia un Commento

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *